“What if performance challenges strict divisions about where the
art ends and the rest of the world begins?” (15)
I always feel like something of a heel using a quote from so
early in the book, but I felt like this idea merited some discussion.
According to the manifesto I’m writing for Blair’s class, art is inherently
liminal, in that it is always negotiating that space between real and
representational. And, on the scale of liminality, theatre is the one
that spends the most space in this in-between. And, in the terms of this
book, when theatre begins to interact not only with a real audience, but with
the really real social world outside the theatre doors, this line becomes ever
more delicate, ever more blurry. Brecht wanted his theatre to remain
distinctly unreal so that it could inspire real action in its audience.
Augusto Boal took his theatre to society, rather than expecting society to come
to his theatre. The Tectonic Theatre Project’s use of documentary
techniques in building their theatre has real people’s words coming out of the
mouths of actors, hoping to challenge the audience’s perceptions of real events
and issues. Paul Chan felt the pull of New Orleans from the comfort of
his New York apartment and felt that the only way he could answer that pull was
to put a 60-year-old piece of European art into direct conversation with the
all too real landscape of devastation in the ninth ward. What is the
responsibility art takes on when it edges its way closer and closer to
reality? And not just any reality, but the sensitive realities that
surround social issues. Art can never be really real, or it simply
becomes life instead of art, so where does this kind of “experimental” theatre
practice fall on the continuum? Certainly, as Jackson points out, this is
a delicate distinction as well: “Experimental art performances use visual,
embodied, collective, durational, and spatial systems, but a critical sense of
their innovation will differ depending upon what medium they understand
themselves to be disrupting, i.e. which medium is on the other end of whose
‘post.’” (2) So while navigating theatre that participates in social
discourse, we have to take not of its interaction with reality, its interaction
with issues, and its interaction with the history of the art form itself in
order to be aware of all the levels of codes present in any given performance.
And all of that may well prove to be the easy part.
No comments:
Post a Comment